Skip to content

Conversation

@colehaus
Copy link

Useful for changing the type of the underlying collection.
The 'h' in "hmap" is for higher-order.

I could also easily be convinced to use the name hoist: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/mmorph-1.1.2/docs/Control-Monad-Morph.html#v:hoist.

Useful for changing the type of the underlying collection.
The 'h' in "hmap" is for higher-order.
@JordanMartinez
Copy link
Contributor

I think hoist is a better name than hmap, especially so that it doesn't get confused with hmap.

However, the real question is whether it's worth adding this to a core library.

@JordanMartinez
Copy link
Contributor

Or put differently, does it pass the Fairbairn Threshold?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants